As of 2016, federal outlays continued to outstrip tax receipts, leaving the government in deficit. Throughout his campaign, Trump vowed to lower both corporate and personal income taxes which would put an immediate strain on the current deficit and likely widen it, unless spending is somehow accounted for, Aslam says.
“The wall will likely have to be paid for by the government, which essentially puts the costs onto the tax payer, while simultaneously lowering tax rates. Unless foreign direct investment somehow plugs this gaping hole then this could put significant strain on the deficit and could ring alarm bells from rating’s agencies,” Aslam says.
Moody’s is assessing the U.S. credit rating on Friday. It is unlikely that they will make any changes to the rating. Moody’s said in September that the outcome of the election would have no impact on the U.S. credit standing but changed their tune somewhat in a January 24 report. Infrastructure spending was not mentioned as problematic. Here’s what they said a month ago: “The new administration’s choices with respect to medium-term fiscal policy will have a greater impact on the US’s credit profile than has been the case in the recent past. Policy and legislative actions to either reduce or finance the rising burden of entitlements spending will be particularly important because the cost of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid will rise materially in the coming years.”